There have been two great accidents in my life. One was the trolley, and the other was Diego. Diego was by far the worst.
Frida Kahlo
The trolley accident that changed Frida Kahlo’s life happened when she was eighteen. It collided with a bus in which she was travelling home from school. A steel handrail impaled her through the hip, fracturing her spine and pelvis. Her right leg, already weakened by a bout of polio when she was an infant, was broken in eleven places and her right foot crushed and dislocated. The accident left her in pain, both physically and psychologically, for the rest of her life.
Feet, what do I need you for when I have wings to fly?
Frida Kahlo
But what about the ‘accident’ that was Diego? Her marriage with fellow artist Diego Rivera was for much of their time together a somewhat tumultuous one. They lived separately for many years, both had affairs and in 1939 divorced, only to remarry the following year. Despite the many affairs and other differences, there seems to have been a connection between them that neither could resist.
Frida suffered several miscarriages and went through many operations to try to address her chronic health problems. In the latter years of her life she had to use a wheelchair and also spent long periods house- or even bed-bound. She had started to paint after her accident, when her parents had a special easel made for her so she could do so while lying in bed. Towards the end of her life her right leg was amputated because of gangrene.
During her lifetime she was less acclaimed as an artist than Rivera, who was commissioned to paint his large frescoes not only in Mexico but in many cities in the US. It was only posthumously that she gained more recognition, gradually evolving into the icon she is today. That iconic status, however, is based as much upon perceptions of her life as on her art – maybe more so. She has become a symbol of non-conformity, of feminism and survival against the odds. Perhaps ironically, her image has become more famous than any of her paintings. We saw it everywhere in Mexico, on all kinds of goods for the tourist market: clothing, paintings, ornaments, bags and more.
And her home in Coyoacan has become a place of pilgrimage for her admirers (I almost said worshippers) and a must-visit for anyone interested in art more generally. I promised you a virtual visit in my previous post about Coyoacan; here it is!
The Casa Azul
This house in Coyoacan was Frida’s birthplace, the family home. She lived there as a child and also in later life, having inherited it when her father died. Today it is a museum showcasing her life and some of her works. As someone who was only vaguely aware of her and her life story I found it both fascinating and moving. I am always intrigued to see the homes where great art was created, whether of writers, painters or others. They seem often to still hold an intangible magic in the air. This was no exception, despite the crowds that thronged its courtyard and small rooms.
Unsurprisingly given the name, the house is painted in a beautiful deep blue which alone would have been enough to attract the photographer in me.
In one area of the courtyard we found a display of sculptures by Mardonio Magaña, whose work the couple admired and supported.
Once inside the crowds made it hard to take in everything at times. But with patience we saw most of the displays and learned a lot about her life. The first rooms are set out as a museum, telling the story of her childhood, battles with disability and how this influenced her art. She was someone who painted not only what she saw but primarily what she felt.
I never paint dreams or nightmares. I paint my own reality.
Frida Kahlo
Some of her works were displayed alongside the ancient artefacts that inspired them; she and Rivera were keen collectors of pre-Hispanic art. Many of her paintings were self-portraits or included her portrait within them.
The painting on the left above especially intrigued me. It is called ‘The Love Embrace of the Universe, the Earth (Mexico), Myself, Diego and Señor Xólotl’. The website of the Frida Kahlo organisation says of it:
This painting has many elements of Mexican mythology. In her arm, she is holding her husband Diego Rivera like a baby. Diego has a face and body of an adult man and also has a third eye in his forehead, which is a symbol for wisdom but he is depicted as a baby need to be nursed by the woman, which is Frida herself. Both of them are held by the Aztec Earth Mother, Cihuacoatl, which is a character in Mexican mythology and made from clay and rock. The outermost image is the Universal Mother who is holding everything and half-dark, half-bright.
Later rooms in the house are as they were when she lived here with Rivera. They include her studio, a traditional Mexican kitchen and several bedrooms.
On the far side of the garden a separate building displays some of her many distinctive dresses. Another shows how her style influenced some of the major fashion designers, including Gaultier. I found these interesting but hard to photograph as they were behind glass.
Museo Anahuacalli
Our guide Alfonso told us that of the Casa Azul and the Museo Anahuacalli he preferred the latter. But although I found the building and idea behind it interesting, and was glad to have visited, it was far less engaging than Frida’s home.
I had expected to see more of Rivera’s work here, having been intrigued by his mural Sueño de una tarde dominical en la Alameda Central (Dream of a Sunday afternoon in the Alameda Central) when we saw it a few days previously. But no, this a museum not about Rivera, but by him. He conceived of this as a place to encourage interest in the arts and to house his considerable collection of pre-Hispanic figures.
The building is influenced by Mayan architecture and by the layout of Teotihuacan. It also incorporates more modern influences, such as Art Deco and the work of Frank Lloyd Wright, with whom Rivera corresponded. Both were interested in the integration of architecture with the surrounding landscape. In the case of Anahuacalli that landscape was a lava field left by an ancient volcanic eruption, with an ecosystem of desert plants. I found the cacti planted here particularly photogenic.
The plaza in front of the building was designed to host dance and music performances, and the smaller buildings around it to house exhibitions. Inside his vast collection of artefacts from the country’s past is displayed, beautifully lit but unlabelled. The museum’s website explains:
The distribution of the pieces in the 23 rooms of the Anahuacalli Museum does not respond to an archaeological order, but rather an aesthetic vision. Rivera sought to link the representations of ancient cultures with contemporary art, so that a continuous timeline was constructed. For this reason, the pieces do not have an explanatory certificate, so that they can be appreciated in themselves as a current work of art.
The initial impact is impressive, and I liked quite a few of the objects. But I quite quickly found the displays, in room after room, rather monotonous. I confess we didn’t explore thoroughly but retreated after a while to the pleasant café for a cold drink!
In the pre-Hispanic world everything in the life of the people was artistic, from the palaces and temples which are monumental works of sculpture, with their magnificent frescoes that amaze everyone peering at them in the jungle, down to the most humble pot used daily, and the children’s toys, and the stone to grind grain. Everything was a work of art, ninety-nine percent of the time, a masterpiece.
Diego Rivera
I visited Coyoacan in February 2024
28 Comments
Pingback:
Marie
We knew very little about either of them (apart from her image) before visiting the city in Jan 2020. We loved her house – as you say, the building alone is attractive in itself and it was nice that it’s a tribute to her rather than both of them. We got to see several Rivera murals around town but didn’t include that museum. We certainly came away from the city with a whole new perspective on their acclaim and prestige
Sarah Wilkie
Yes, we were exactly the same – apart from her image and one or two self-portraits I knew very little about Frida and her art, and nothing at all about Rivera. Like you I learned a lot 🙂
leightontravels
We would love to visit both these locations someday. We can’t seem to get away from Frida (not that we’d want to), she is everywhere in murals and at cafes, restaurants and bookstores in just about every country we’ve ever visited. The crowds sound tough but I couldn’t resist all the art, colour and historic objects that speaks to the former collector in me. There is a sadness to all the beauty, which always pulls my chain.
Sarah Wilkie
I know what you mean about not being able to get away from her, but I find it a little sad that the images we most often see are of her face rather than her art. I was pleased to be able to see more of the latter here as well as to learn more about her. And the house was stunning!
rkrontheroad
Two favorite artists… I’m glad to see your photos of her home. Her paintings are so full of the pain she endured in life. The photo of pottery in the kitchen intrigued me, as a one-time potter.
Sarah Wilkie
Glad you enjoyed this Ruth 🙂 They seem to have been avid collectors not just of Pre-Hispanic artefacts but also contemporary pottery and sculpture.
grandmisadventures
It was interesting to learn more about Frida. There seems to be so much sadness in her history which must have given her art such depth
Sarah Wilkie
I’m sure you’re right Meg, her art wouldn’t have been what it was without so much tragedy in her life
Annie Berger
Another compelling read on an artist more famous after her death than in life, Sarah. The shade of blue chosen for her house must have just grabbed you!
Sarah Wilkie
Oh yes, that blue was just glorious! Thank you Annie 🙂
Anabel @ The Glasgow Gallivanter
Very interesting, i would love to see Frida’s home.
Sarah Wilkie
Yes, I reckon you’d find this particularly fascinating, given your interest in women’s history as well as art 🙂
margaret21
Somehow, Kahlo has passed beneath my radar and I barely know her work. Seeing her legacy in her home milieu would have been a great introduction, so thanks for effecting it for me.
Sarah Wilkie
Thank you Margaret 🙂 I knew very little about her too, so I was really glad to visit her home/museum and get to know more, and now to be able to share that with others.
margaret21
Excellent!
Anonymous
Frida’s life is a lesson for everyone . Never take life for granted.
Sarah Wilkie
That’s very true. But look what she made of it!
Aletta - nowathome
Wow, it is just amazing to read about her life.
Sarah Wilkie
Glad you enjoyed this Aletta, thank you 🙂
Anne Sandler
Thank you for this profile and pictures of Frida’s art. She was certainly a woman of courage.
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks Anne, yes, definitely courageous in the face of adversity.
Teresa
I also know Frida because of her famous face but know nothing of her story and Diego’s and her art. Glad to know more of her through your blog. Love the vibrant blues of her house. The cacti as well seem like a work of art. Thanks for the share, Sarah!
Sarah Wilkie
Glad you enjoyed this and found it interesting Teresa 🙂 I knew relatively little about her too and I’m so glad to have got to know her better and to be able to share her story.
thehungrytravellers.blog
Our time in Mexico only touched the Frida Karlo story on brief occasions, and in passing, though in one place we stayed in “the Karlo Room” with many depictions of her paintings. Hers was an unusual and compelling story, to say the least.
Sarah Wilkie
That room sounds like fun! Yes, her story was unusual and I read pieces by art historians who bemoaned the fact that she’s known primarily for that and the art itself often put to one side or taking a back seat.
Anonymous
Oh, fascinating – interesting place to visit
Sarah Wilkie
Thank you, I’m glad you enjoyed it 🙂