Lens-Artists,  People,  Photographic techniques,  Themed galleries

Gallery: photographing clothes and souls

I used this quote last year to introduce a Monochrome Madness post about black and white portraiture. It’s a favourite of mine as I think it encapsulates an important difference between the two media. As I said it that previous post,

Without the distraction of colours, the focus shifts more to the subject’s face and expression. The eyes in particular seem to stand out more, and consequently as a viewer you often feel more connected to the person. And the absence of colour results in an emphasis on shape and form, often making the people seem more significant than their surroundings.

In that previous post I included only images in monochrome (with one exception). But now Patti challenges us to consider the merits of black and white versus colour. I thought it would be interesting to revisit the subject of people but this time compare both colour and black and white versions of some shots.

Personally I believe that in the end the choice of colour or monochrome comes down to the story you want to tell. Is it more important to emphasise the person’s surroundings, or their clothing, or an aspect of their lives? Or are you more interested in the character of an individual as seen in their expression perhaps? Both are valid but usually one β€˜story’ seems more important or interesting to me than the other.

Contrast these two examples from Moranbong Park in Pyongyang, North Korea:

Wedding couple
A pause in the dancing

For the young couple the use of colour shows off the woman’s dress, something I feel she would be keen for us to appreciate. And her pretty hair adornments are much more obvious. But in the shot of the older woman, I was more interested in her expression and what it tells us about what has probably been a hard life. She was here in the park to dance and celebrate, which she did with gusto, but when she tired and took a break her face told a different story; one best expressed, I feel, in black and white.

In Bandipur, Nepal

Patti asked us to restrict our selection to three pairs, which I found very challenging! But I settled on this as my final example. The girl’s clothing is colourful and there’s a warmth to the wooden door she sits by. But the monochrome edit, to which I also added a slight vignette, holds your eye on her rather than wandering around the whole image. If I had to choose I would opt for that monochrome version.

Please tell me in the comments which versions of these shots you prefer, and whether or not you agree with the quote by Ted Grant above. All the monochrome versions were edited with Nik Silver Efex Pro and the colour ones with Photoshop Elements and/or Nik Color Efex Pro.

41 Comments

  • Rose

    I love the quote, Sarah. The first couple: I think they look better in color, in b&w you can see there’s a hint of joy, but the color really brings it out. The other 2 photos feel more deeper, more contemplative in b&w. They touch the spirit in a different way.

  • Easymalc

    Interesting subject Sarah, but for me I’m afraid I just see time as a mitigating factor more than anything else (not exclusively so though). When they brought images and film into the modern age of colour from what was originally done in B&W it lost its impact for me, but that’s just my thoughts, and straying away from the challenge somewhat.

    • Sarah Wilkie

      I don’t think you’re straying away from the challenge Malcolm as the point of it was to weigh up the pros and cons of each medium. I guess I’m used to seeing B&W still a lot in the work of many photographers, including professionals, so for me it isn’t an historic thing. I would argue that the advent of colour film gave us an option that wasn’t previously available but we can choose whether or not to use it – just as artists can choose whether to sketch in charcoal or paint in watercolour for example.

      • Easymalc

        I can’t argue with that. Henri Cartier Bresson was a great photogapher in my eyes, and so of course was Ansel Adams but in a different way, but I take your point that colour brought a whole new dimension to photography – and I’m glad it did.

  • I. J. Khanewala

    Absolutely. Portraits in black and white focus your attention on the person. That’s true even in the second photo, where the B&W treatment is actually rather good even for her dress.

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Thank you – I know what you mean about the second one, I do think it works in B&W but at the same time it’s a shame to lose the colours on her dress and in her hair.

  • shoestringdiary

    I normally use monochrome shots when the scene (usually landscapes) isn’t that colorful and to emphasize contrast. But I only realized now how monochrome can be used to highlight facial expressions. Thanks for sharing this. (Leo)

  • Alison

    I think the young girl for me Sarah, her expression shows up so much more in black and white. Very clever how you’ve incorporated all three pairs in the feature photo

  • EgΓ­dio

    Sarah, the quote you used to open your post is perfect. In the three sets you shared, I picked the monochrome every time. I can see using colors in portraits when I want to highlight a culture’s way of dressing, etc. Great post!

  • Anne Sandler

    Great choices for this challenge Sarah. For the wedding couple, I prefer color. It shows the brightness of the occasion. However, I like the two portraits in B&W. The lack of color allows the pictures to tell their stories through expression and contrast.

  • kzmcb

    Oh yes, it’s a good quote and you’ve illustrated it perfectly. I think the first two do it better and if I had to pick I’d go the second – but aged faces have more stories etched on them.

  • restlessjo

    I’m very wishy washy on this subject, Sarah. Although I agree with the quote and your assessment, I often can’t say I have a preference. They are almost like two entirely separate subjects and the black and white seems to change their character. The young woman at the end seems quite hostile in black and white.

  • Sue

    Well, I agree that the
    ‘absence of colour results in an emphasis on shape and form, often making the people seem more significant than their surroundings.’ And on the whole,I prefer B&W for portraits. Certainly your second and third images are best in monochrome, the old lady a powerful image

  • Monkey's Tale

    I actually think I prefer the coloured version, especially of the older woman. I find I’m distracted by the spot on her face in the b&w, where I don’t notice it in the colour version. The lady on the stairs, I can’t chose a favourite, and I prefer the couple in colour for some reason. Maggie

    • Sarah Wilkie

      Thank you for your interesting feedback Maggie πŸ™‚ You prove how subjective these things are! I agree with you about the young couple but the other two I prefer in B&W. I’m not sure what you mean about a spot on the older woman’s face as her complexion is generally quite mottled!

  • Patricia Moed

    Hi Sarah. Yes…I agree with you here: “Personally I believe that in the end the choice of colour or monochrome comes down to the story you want to tell…. Both are valid but usually one β€˜story’ seems more important or interesting to me than the other.” The story and your intention are the primary factors. As for my favorites…I really like all 3 in b&w! I think the personality/soul of the people really shine that way….as your quote beautifully states!

  • margaret21

    You write an interesting commentary, and yes, circumstances alter cases. But as a general rule, I prefer b/w for portraits. The subjects come alive and force your focus onto them, I think.

Do share your thoughts, I'd love to hear from you! And please include your name in case WP marks you 'anonymous' - thank you