Photoshop is useful in many ways but must NEVER be used for the altering of photographs.
Elliott Erwitt
I am going to dare to disagree with Elliott Erwitt on this. In my view altering photographs is absolutely acceptable provided it isnโt done as a form of lying.
And what would you use Photoshop for, I wonder, other than the altering of photographs?
Normally when I edit an image I do so with the intention of bringing out more clearly what I saw when I took it. I may adjust the exposure, straighten the horizon, boost the colours a little. Iโll crop to give a more pleasing (to my eye) frame to the image, and yes, I may erase the odd telephone wire or a person who strayed into shot. But the result is usually pretty close to the view as I saw it.
However, sometimes itโs fun to take things to extremes, and thatโs OK too as long as youโre honest about doing so. I recently invested in Luminar AI software which has the potential to radically alter a photo: changing the sky completely; adding things that were never there (birds, lightening, sun rays); even turning day to night. Of course it can also be used for much more subtle and natural edits, which is how, for the most part, I expect to use it.
But for Terriโs Sunday Stills challenge this week I thought it would be cool to try to create some eerie images. In the interests of complete honesty I include the original shots too! In some the effect is stronger than others, deliberately. Which do you prefer?
The Cambridge dictionary defines eerie as โstrange in a frightening and mysterious wayโ. Iโve tried to make these images strange and mysterious, but Iโm not sure if they are frightening. Maybe you will find some of them so.
The first two images are from my very recent weekend away in England, the rest from my travel archives.
The gallery:
Stonehenge: reimagined in a scene from The Birds
Stonehenge: made more eerie by moonlight
Sugar mill near Lamanai, Belize: morning mist emphasised
Lamanai lagoon, Belize: a gentle sunset made a little more dramatic
Bundi Palace, India: a spooky night time transformation
Corfe Castle, Dorset: eerie anyway but more so with a storm at night
City of Rocks, NM: there was a storm threatening which I’ve greatly exaggerated
Bandelier National Monument, NM: edited for moodiness
Halong Bay, Vietnam: adding drama and texture
And for complete honesty, here’s the original of the Madrid (New Mexico) house seen in my featured photo:
49 Comments
Kirstin
Wow Great job with the photo edits. How fun.
Sarah Wilkie
Thank you Kirstin, I did enjoy creating these ๐
rkrontheroad
How fun, well done!
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks Ruth!
Cath Moore
that is a very interesting editing tool…..I love the addition of black birds for this particular theme….certainly adds more eerie to the scene. My favourite is the first picture that you posted.
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks Cath ๐ Yes, the black birds work well as long as you don’t overdo them. For a couple of shots I went back into Photoshop to erase a couple of the birds because I thought it looked too much!
thehungrytravellers.blog
I think this is a fun thing to do. Love the way you can slide across to see the differences๐
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks ๐ That ‘image compare’ block is ideal for this sort of post!
wetanddustyroads
This was a fun post – to see what you can do with a little bit of magic! For me, these photo’s are definitely not frightening, but some are a bit eerie! You definitely have added a lot of drama to the Halong Bay photo … but my favourite must be the moon over Stonehenge!
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks ๐ I’m glad you find them eerie rather than frightening, as that’s the effect I was aiming for! And the Stonehenge moon is probably my favourite too ๐
I. J. Khanewala
Ha ha. Interesting halloween edits: ominous birds, spooky mist, forked lightning …
Sarah Wilkie
Thank you ๐ Yes, good fun for Halloween!
Sue
These are great! What fun you had
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks Sue, I did indeed! I’ll have to try again some time but with a different theme perhaps ๐
Sue
That would be good!
Marie
Ha – love them …. bet you enjoyed it.
Sarah Wilkie
I did – it was great fun fiddling to get an effect that pleased me ๐
Marie
๐ท๐ธ๐ท๐ธ
margaret21
I’m not too much a fan of ‘messing about’, beyond a bit of cropping and colour adjustment, but these are effective and fun.
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks Margaret, glad you found them effective. Sometimes I enjoy ‘messing about’ and at other times like you I just want to make small adjustments – it depends on my mood, the photo, and how I want to use it ๐
margaret21
Maybe grotty winter days would be a chance for me to change my mind.
Sarah Wilkie
This can be a fun way to spend an afternoon when the weather isn’t good enough to tempt you outside to take new photos. Unearth a folder of old ones and see what you can create!
margaret21
Challenge accepted – for the dark days of winter.
Sarah Wilkie
Great – and do share your best efforts!
the eternal traveller
I like the moon over Stonehenge.
Sarah Wilkie
Thank you, that’s one of my favourites too ๐
Manja Maksimoviฤ
It is quite scary what it can do, rather like artificial intelligence. I’m afraid of that too. ๐ I do like your opening house though. An honest lie is a good lie.
Sarah Wilkie
Interesting that you mention artificial intelligence Manja, because that’s just what the AI in ‘Luminar AI’ stands for! It uses AI to recognise what is sky in the image, what is a person and so on. So to create a different looking sky you don’t have to go through the tedious process of selecting it, working around trees and other objects – the software does it for you ๐
Manja Maksimoviฤ
Ha! I thought it was Al, short for Albert. ๐
Sarah Wilkie
๐๐
Suzanne@PictureRetirement
Sarah, I completely agree with your thoughts on postprocessing. There is a fine line between deception and artistic enhancement. Images manipulated to this degree should be disclosed as photo art. You did an amazing job and I love them all. Once again, you have nailed the challenge.
Sarah Wilkie
Thank you Suzanne ๐ I’m so glad you liked these and understood the distinction I was making!
Terri Webster Schrandt
Wow, Sarah, I love your interpretation with editing using Photoshop and Luminar! I LOVE what you did with the moon behind Stonehenge (a must-see for me someday). Really eerie and an excellent idea of how editing can make a fantastic book cover! I love your addition of the birds and the lightning as well. Very well done and so much fun! Glad you see your awesome post shared at Sunday Stills this week!
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks so much Terri ๐ I hadn’t thought of these looking like book covers but I can see what you mean! Thanks for setting the theme that challenged me to play around with these, I had lots of fun doing so!
Terri Webster Schrandt
I have LR and photoshop…I need to use them more. Was Luminar expensive?
Terri Webster Schrandt
Glad you enjoyed, Sarah! Is Luminar expensive? I need to use my LR and Photoshop since I have them ๐
Sarah Wilkie
I paid about ยฃ60 for Luminar AI and advance purchase of Luminar Neo which will launch this winter and have more in the way of creative tools (multiple exposure, for instance). AI alone would have been about ยฃ40 I think. That equates to about $80 / $54 and is a one-off purchase, not a subscription. So I think it’s pretty reasonable. You do have to pay extra for various add-on packs giving more effects, if you want them, although they seem to supply occasional free ones – I got a set of B&W filters recently, for instance.
Terri Webster Schrandt
Thanks for the info, Sarah…sorry for that double comment–my phone didn’t show me the first one sent! Not a bad price at all!
Nemorino
I use a program (which I believe comes from South Korea) called Photoscape X Pro. I don’t think it does everything that Photoshop can do, but for my purposes it’s fine. Here in Germany we tend to have lots of dull, overcast days, especially this time of year, so I’m thankful for the Brightening feature, among others. Like you, I edit photos “with the intention of bringing out more clearly what I saw when I took it” โ as you so nicely expressed it above.
Sarah Wilkie
Hi Don. I hadn’t heard of Photoscape X Pro so I Googled it. It does sound good as an alternative to Photoshop. I only use PS Elements which is the more basic version but still has most of what I need, plus I have the Nik Color Efex plug-in which is brilliant. Those work fine for all my usual processes but I bought Luminar AI on a one-off deal so I could have some fun with its filters and effects. I’ve since found it can also be good for basic edits too but so far I’ve stuck with Elements as my go-to software. Who knows, I may migrate over time?
Annie Berger
Sarah,
Fascinating what one can do to change totally a photo. I’ve never tried it with Photoshop, thinking I was so adventurous with just the edit function on my phone! The photo I found the spookiest, especially since Halloween has just passed, was the enhanced one of Halong Bay! Have driven through New Mexico oodles of times since we’re from neighboring Colorado but haven’t stopped at either Corfe or Bandolier – will have to rectify that, I can see.
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks Annie ๐ These weren’t done with Photoshop however – I only have Elements and I’m not sure it would be very easy to achieve these effects with that. It would involve a lot of work with layers and multiple images, which I’m not adept at! I used Luminar AI which makes it ridiculously easy – you can play around with different looks and add a number of elements such as the birds and lightening I’ve used here. Oh, and while I highly recommend a visit to Bandelier, I’m sorry if I misled you about Corfe Castle through its position in my list – it’s in Dorset in the UK ๐
maristravels
Spooky isn’t the word. If I came upon any of these scenes on a dark night alone I’d run the proverbial mile, probably with my luck falling over my feet! Favourite is the Lamani Lagoon one, then the old house in Madrid, then the City of Rocks. What you’ve done is very thought provoking.
Sarah Wilkie
Oh dear, I wouldn’t want to send you tumbling ๐ Although I have to say, that’s exactly what I would do! Thanks for highlighting your favourites. The City of Rocks is one of mine I think, along with the moon over Stonehenge ๐
Pat
Hi Sarah, very interesting. I feel the same way about post-processing. It is a delicate balance between the schools of accurate recreation and artistic alteration. I am somewhere around making the photo look the way my mind and soul saw it (like you) and using the artistic freedom of a painter. I use Lightroom but not Photoshop.
Sarah Wilkie
Thanks Pat – yes, sounds like we are very much in line on this ๐ Sometimes I prefer one approach, sometimes the other – depending on the image, on what I am trying to say with it and on my mood at the time.
Pat
I hear you – me, too.
Oh, the Places We See
These are fun! And they must have been fun to create!
Sarah Wilkie
They were! I could have played around much longer and created far more images than I could have used in a single post ๐